William James + 40 : Issues in the investigation of implicature
نویسنده
چکیده
...a distinction...within the total signification of a remark...between what the speaker has said (in a certain favored and maybe in some degree artificial, sense of “said”), and what he has implicated (e.g., implied, indicated, suggested, etc.), taking into account the fact that what he has implicated may be either conventionally implicated (implicated by virtue of the meaning of some word or phrase which he has used) or non-conventionally implicated (in which case the specification of implicature falls outside the specification of the conventional meaning of the words used). (Grice [1967] 1989: 118)
منابع مشابه
Reflections on Jennifer Saul's View of Successful Communication and Conversational Implicature
Saul (2002) criticizes a view on the relationship between speaker meaning and conversational implicatures according to which speaker meaning is exhaustively comprised of what is said and what is implicated. In the course of making her points, she develops a couple of new notions which she calls “utterer-implicature” and “audience-implicature”. She then makes certain claims about the relationshi...
متن کاملReview of the Effect of Non-Epistemic Factors on Religious Belief from the Perspective of William James
یکی از مباحث مهمّی که امروزه در حوزة معرفت‌شناسی مطرح است، بحث میزان تأثیر عوامل غیرمعرفتی بر باور دینی انسان می‌باشد. بررسی امکان تأثیر عوامل غیرمعرفتی بر معرفت، به عهدة معرفت‌شناسان است و در این مقاله می‌کوشیم تا دریابیم که آیا فرایند تکوین باورهای انسان در مسیری جدای از ساحت غیرعقیدتی شکل می‌گیرد یا آنکه ساحت‌های وجودی انسان در عین تمایز از یکدیگر، چنان در تأثیر و تأثّر متقابل با یکدیگرند که ب...
متن کاملThe Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature
I've known about conversational implicature a lot longer than I've known Larry. In 1967 I read Grice's " Logical and Conversation " in mimeograph, shortly after his William James lectures, and I read its precursor " (Implication), " section III of " The Causal Theory of Perception " , well before that. And I've thought, read, and written about implicature off and on ever since. Nevertheless, I ...
متن کاملFive Answers on Pragmatism
Prof. Haack answers a series of questions on pragmatism, beginning with the origins of this tradition in the work of Peirce and James, its evolution in the work of Dewey and Mead, and its influence beyond the United States in, for example, the Italian pragmatists and the radical British pragmatist F. C. S. Schiller. Classical pragmatism, she observes, is a rich and varied tradition from which t...
متن کاملEquilibrium and Realization: William Chittick on Self and Cosmos
William Chittick, currently Professor of Religious Studies at the State University of New York (Stony Brook), is an internationally renowned expert on Islamic thought. His contributions to the fields of Sufism and Islamic philosophy have helped paint a clearer picture of the intellectual and spiritual landscape of Islamic civilization from the 7th/13th century onwards. Yet Chittick is not simpl...
متن کامل